AI Transparency Obligation
The EU AI Act's requirement that providers of certain AI systems disclose their AI nature to users, enabling informed interaction and supporting accountability in legal AI deployments.
Last reviewed: 2026/05/18
Definition
Why It Matters for Lawyers
Frequently Asked Questions
- Q: Does a lawyer who uses AI to draft a document need to disclose this to the client?
- The EU AI Act transparency obligation applies to interactive AI systems, not to AI used as a drafting aid. However, professional conduct rules in many jurisdictions are developing guidance on disclosure of AI use to clients. Lawyers should monitor their bar association's evolving guidance independently of the AI Act.
- Q: What constitutes sufficient disclosure that a user is interacting with AI?
- A clear, prominent notice at the start of an interaction — stating that the user is communicating with an AI system — generally satisfies the Article 50 requirement. Burying the disclosure in terms of service or using vague language (such as "automated assistant") is unlikely to be sufficient. --- *Last reviewed: 2026-05-19 by LawyerAI Editorial Team.*
Last reviewed: 2026/05/18. Definitions are written by the LawyerAI Editorial team. We do not accept affiliate commissions; Featured placement is clearly labeled and does not influence editorial content.