Litigence is a litigation intelligence platform focused on judge-level analytics and motion outcome prediction. The product surfaces patterns in how individual judges decide procedural motions, with district-to-district comparisons to support venue selection and timing decisions.
Core capabilities: judge profiles covering motion grant rates, average decision timing, and notable procedural preferences; motion outcome prediction with confidence scoring; cross-district comparisons; and bulk case search that filters by judge, motion type, and party representation.
Best fit: Big Law litigation teams and mid-size firms with repeat federal court practice. The platform is most useful for procedural motions (summary judgment, dismiss, transfer) where judicial discretion is decisive.
Pricing is enterprise-tier with custom quotes. The product is newer than competitors like Lex Machina and Premonition, so coverage depth varies by jurisdiction.
Litigence vs Legalytics: both build on docket data, but Litigence is more narrowly focused on motion-level granularity while Legalytics offers broader case-outcome scoring. Trial a sample of typical motions before committing.
